06-06-2018, 02:18 PM
Hi Roger,
The Draft FYSO 2018-2022 mentions the ED2 (page 62 and table 4, page 4) but no specific time is mentioned as to when ED2 might be released and over what time frame.
The rest of the FYSO still refers to the different types of licence.
I see mention that the sunset date has been changed to April 1 2023, with a clear indication that DoCA and ACMA will have achieved the required changes prior to that date.
My first paragraph refers to my understanding that many services are still of the belief that changes to the RadCom act (1992) are still not a fait accompli, when in fact, as you quote from the DoCA Website, "parameter- based licensing will be introduced".
Another item that I picked up in reading the FYSO was this little gem.
Table 9, page 20 3.3 - 3.4GHz
"Noting incumbent use of the band, the ACMA is of the view that this band may be a candidate for consideration of dynamic spectrum-access type arrangements, to promote sharing and increase the utility of the band. If the ACMA pursues this idea, it will engage further with relevant stakeholders".
It will be interesting to read any discussion papers released with the ED2 and how they will affect Amateur licensing arrangements.
Cheers
Peter VK3QI
Hi Roger,
The Draft FYSO 2018-2022 mentions the ED2 (page 62 and table 4, page 4) but no specific time is mentioned as to when ED2 might be released and over what time frame.
The rest of the FYSO still refers to the different types of licence.
I see mention that the sunset date has been changed to April 1 2023, with a clear indication that DoCA and ACMA will have achieved the required changes prior to that date.
My first paragraph refers to my understanding that many services are still of the belief that changes to the RadCom act (1992) are still not a fait accompli, when in fact, as you quote from the DoCA Website, "parameter- based licensing will be introduced".
Another item that I picked up in reading the FYSO was this little gem.
Table 9, page 20 3.3 - 3.4GHz
"Noting incumbent use of the band, the ACMA is of the view that this band may be a candidate for consideration of dynamic spectrum-access type arrangements, to promote sharing and increase the utility of the band. If the ACMA pursues this idea, it will engage further with relevant stakeholders".
It will be interesting to read any discussion papers released with the ED2 and how they will affect Amateur licensing arrangements.
Cheers
Peter VK3QI
The Draft FYSO 2018-2022 mentions the ED2 (page 62 and table 4, page 4) but no specific time is mentioned as to when ED2 might be released and over what time frame.
The rest of the FYSO still refers to the different types of licence.
I see mention that the sunset date has been changed to April 1 2023, with a clear indication that DoCA and ACMA will have achieved the required changes prior to that date.
My first paragraph refers to my understanding that many services are still of the belief that changes to the RadCom act (1992) are still not a fait accompli, when in fact, as you quote from the DoCA Website, "parameter- based licensing will be introduced".
Another item that I picked up in reading the FYSO was this little gem.
Table 9, page 20 3.3 - 3.4GHz
"Noting incumbent use of the band, the ACMA is of the view that this band may be a candidate for consideration of dynamic spectrum-access type arrangements, to promote sharing and increase the utility of the band. If the ACMA pursues this idea, it will engage further with relevant stakeholders".
It will be interesting to read any discussion papers released with the ED2 and how they will affect Amateur licensing arrangements.
Cheers
Peter VK3QI
Hi Roger,
The Draft FYSO 2018-2022 mentions the ED2 (page 62 and table 4, page 4) but no specific time is mentioned as to when ED2 might be released and over what time frame.
The rest of the FYSO still refers to the different types of licence.
I see mention that the sunset date has been changed to April 1 2023, with a clear indication that DoCA and ACMA will have achieved the required changes prior to that date.
My first paragraph refers to my understanding that many services are still of the belief that changes to the RadCom act (1992) are still not a fait accompli, when in fact, as you quote from the DoCA Website, "parameter- based licensing will be introduced".
Another item that I picked up in reading the FYSO was this little gem.
Table 9, page 20 3.3 - 3.4GHz
"Noting incumbent use of the band, the ACMA is of the view that this band may be a candidate for consideration of dynamic spectrum-access type arrangements, to promote sharing and increase the utility of the band. If the ACMA pursues this idea, it will engage further with relevant stakeholders".
It will be interesting to read any discussion papers released with the ED2 and how they will affect Amateur licensing arrangements.
Cheers
Peter VK3QI