10-03-2019, 11:46 AM
From the linked legislation:-
Note 1 A transmitter operated under this Class Licence can be expected to be operating in parts of the radiofrequency spectrum used by other radiocommunications devices. A receiver tuned to the transmitter will not be afforded protection from interference caused by other radiocommunications devices. A low interference potential device operated under this Class Licence is generally not expected to suffer interference, however an individual low interference potential device may experience interference arising from the particular circumstances of the device’s operation.
And yet the ACMA and who knows who else are out in force working on the problem while ham's get stuck with the suck it up approach.
Usual story - money talks and b******t walks.
Note 1 A transmitter operated under this Class Licence can be expected to be operating in parts of the radiofrequency spectrum used by other radiocommunications devices. A receiver tuned to the transmitter will not be afforded protection from interference caused by other radiocommunications devices. A low interference potential device operated under this Class Licence is generally not expected to suffer interference, however an individual low interference potential device may experience interference arising from the particular circumstances of the device’s operation.
And yet the ACMA and who knows who else are out in force working on the problem while ham's get stuck with the suck it up approach.
Usual story - money talks and b******t walks.